Friday, 20 October 2017

                                               Archetypal   Approach       

1.      What is the secret theme of the novel Leatherstocking novel?
                                    Miscegenation.

2.      The immensity of water defines a loneliness that demands love.
       
3.      Name the two adjectives used as the setting in the novel regarding homosexual?
                  The Virgin story,the forever inviolable sea.

4.      Name the works in which water is made as the texture of novel?
        In Two Years Before the Mast, Moby Dick and Huckleberry Finn.

5.      The Whiteman's sexual envy of Negro male is considered as a horror of miscegenation.

6.      Name the poet who deals miscegenation as the secret theme in his Leatherstocking novel?
                                       James Fenimore Cooper

7.      What is considered as a horror of miscegenation?
            White man's sexual envy of Negro male.

8.      Chingachgook and the Deerslayer permitted to sit night after night over their campfire in the purest domestic bliss.

9.      What does the author Leslie Fiedler points out in his essay "Come Back to the Raft Again, Huck Honey?
                                                  Homosexuality

10.  Mention the incident were a pair of lovers seek a place of isolation in Leslie Fiedler's essay?
                    Huck and Jim swim behind the raft in the peaceful flux of Mississippi to fulfill their sexual desire.

11.  Give an novel as example in which the setting of the novel is given prominence?
                                            Huckleberry Finn

12.  In Crane's work Negro is disfigured to the part of monstrosity.

13.  What does the work "Syphilis" means?
              Serious sexually transmitted disease

14.  The colored man becomes the victim of white man due to his loneliness, compelling anxiety and isolation.

15.  Name the novel in which the female homosexual romance is presented?
                   Carson McCullers's Member of the Wedding
      
16.  To expose homosexuality the writer takes the pair of lovers to?
                                      Water bodies
17.  In Dana's Hope the colored man is considered as a victim of white man's syphilis.

18.  "There lies between the lovers no naked sword but a childlike ignorance"-What does these words represent?
                                     Physical attraction reveals innocence
19.  Name the novel in which the boy moves in between the love of Negro maid servant and his inverted cousin?
                              Capote's Other Voices, Other Rooms
     
20.  Who wrote the essay "Come Back to the Raft Again, Huck Honey?
                                                         Leslie Fielder
                                                                  
                                                                                          By,
                                                                                              J.Jancy
                                                                                  I M.A English Literature
How does Cleanth Brooks defend ‘’Beauty is truth, truth beauty’’ highlighting the theme                                                                                               
             "Beauty is truth, truth beauty’’. Whatever is beautiful must also be true and whatever is true must also be beautiful. Thus beauty and truth are inseparable. Beauty and truth are two sides of the one and the same thing. Beauty thus has a moral quality and all true morality has a beautiful character. Another interpretation of this line is that beauty lies in the real world of men not merely in act or in the fairyland of fancy. According to this interpretation ‘’truth’’ stands for the real and actual world as distinguished from the world of imagination.  According to still another interpretation, truth have does not mean truth to actual life it means truth to life as one imagine it. The word ‘’truth’’ has obviously a very wide meaning it includes the facts of life as actually lived as also life as one may imagine it. The very ambiguity of the statement, ‘’beauty is truth, truth beauty’’ ‘’ought to warn us’’ says Cleanth Brooks, ‘’against insisting very much on the statement in isolation, and drive us back to a consideration of the context in which the statement is set. The question of real importance is not whether Eliot, Murry, Garrod are right in thinking that ‘’Beauty is truth, truth beauty’’ injures the poem. The urn is beautiful and yet its beauty is based on an imaginative perception of essentials. Such a vision is beautiful but it is also true. Cleanth Brooks observes ‘’it takes a few details and so orders them that we have not only beauty but insight into essential truth. Those who say that the statement ‘’Truth is beauty’’ is false ignore their experience of the tragic act. Beauty is thus a middle term which connects and reconciles two kinds of truth through the mediation of beauty, truth of fact becomes truth of affirmation, truth of life. From the beginning to end, the poem demonstrates that the kind of beauty that the urn has is incommensurate with the kind of truth that man must live by.   The famous words ‘’beauty is truth, truth beauty’’ truth here does not mean truth to the facts of life as actually lived it means truth of life as one may imagine it in terms of the day-dream of having it both ways.
                                                                                       SUBMITTED BY
                                                                                                          Jenophin Jini.


SAILING TO BYZANTIUM
According to yeats;
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ART AND POLITICS
Yeats believed that art and politics were intrinsically linked and used his writing to express his attitudes toward Irish politics, as well as to educate his readers about Irish cultural history. From an early age, Yeats felt a deep connection to Ireland and his national identity, and he thought that British rule negatively impacted Irish politics and social life. His early compilation of folklore sought to teach a literary history that had been suppressed by British rule, and his early poems were odes to the beauty and mystery of the Irish countryside. As Yeats became more involved in Irish politics—through his relationships with the Irish National Theatre, the Irish Literary Society, the Irish Republican Brotherhood, and Maud Gonne—his poems increasingly resembled political manifestos. Yeats wrote numerous poems . Yeats believed that art could serve a political function: poems could both critique and comment on political events, as well as educate and inform a population.
Some of the symbols used in the works of Yeats are
Symbols;
The gyre, a circular or conical shape, appears frequently in Yeats’s poems and was developed as part of the philosophical system outlined in his book A Vision. At first, Yeats used the phases of the moon to articulate his belief that history was structured in terms of ages, but he later settled upon the gyre as a more useful model. He chose the image of interlocking gyres—visually represented as two intersecting conical spirals—to symbolize his philosophical belief that all things could be described in terms of cycles and patterns. Although this is a difficult concept to grasp abstractly, the image makes sense when applied to the waxing and waning of a particular historical age or the evolution of a human life from youth to adulthood to old age.

ThE SWAN
Swans are a common symbol in poetry, often used to depict idealized nature. Yeats rewrites the Greek myth of Zeus and Leda to comment on fate and historical inevitability: Zeus disguises himself as a swan to rape the unsuspecting Leda. Even though Yeats clearly states that the swan is the god Zeus, he also emphasizes the physicality of the swan: the beating wings, the dark webbed feet, the long neck and beak. Through this description of its physical characteristics, the swan becomes a violent divine force. By rendering a well-known poetic symbol as violent and terrifying rather than idealized and beautiful, Yeats manipulates poetic conventions, an act of literary modernism, and adds to the power of the poem.
THE GREAT BEAST
Yeats employs the figure of a great beast—a horrific, violent animal—to embody difficult abstract concepts. The great beast as a symbol comes from Christian iconography, in which it represents evil and darkness. In “The Second Coming,” the great beast emerges from the Spiritus Mundi, or soul of the universe, to function as the primary image of destruction in the poem. Yeats describes the onset of apocalyptic events in which the “blood-dimmed tide is loosed” and the “ceremony of innocence is drowned” as the world enters a new age and falls apart as a result of the widening of the historical gyres. Yeats modifies the well-known image of the sphinx to embody the poem’s vision of the climactic coming. By rendering the terrifying prospect of disruption and change into an easily imagined horrifying monster, Yeats makes an abstract fear become tangible and real.
Some analysis in his poem;
 Yeats is the greatest poet in the history of Ireland and probably the greatest poet to write in English during the twentieth century; his themes, images, symbols, metaphors, and poetic sensibilities encompass the breadth of his personal experience, as well as his nation’s experience during one of its most troubled times. Yeats’s great poetic project was to reify his own life—his thoughts, feelings, speculations, conclusions, dreams—into poetry: to render all of himself into art, but not in a merely confessional or autobiographical manner; he was not interested in the common-place. His elaborate iconography takes elements from Irish mythology, Greek mythology, nineteenth-century occultism, English literature, Byzantine art, European politics, and Christian imagery, all wound together and informed with his own experience and interpretive understanding.
Yeats’s own experience is never far from his poems, even when they seem obscurely imagistic or theoretically abstract, and the veil of obscurity and abstraction is often lifted once one gains an understanding of how the poet’s lived experiences relate to the poem in question.
No poet of the twentieth century more persuasively imposed his personal experience onto history by way of his art; and no poet more successfully plumbed the truths contained within his “deep heart’s core,” even when they threatened to render his poetry clichéd or ridiculous. His integrity and passionate commitment to work according to his own vision protect his poems from all such accusations. But Yeats’s goal is always to arrive at personal truth; and in that sense, despite his profound individuality, he remains one of the most universal writers ever to have lived.
Rhyme Scheme and Meter in "Sailing to Byzantium"
William Butler Yeats’ poem “Sailing to Byzantium,” first published in 1928, wrestles with some of the most problematic binaries in philosophical thought: age and youth, mortality and immortality, transience and permanence, artifice and nature. One of the great Modern poets, Yeats used a variety of rhyme schemes and meters in his vast body of work, but he settled on ottavarima in iambic pentameter for “Sailing to Byzantium.”
Influences;
Yeats wasn’t the first poet to come up with ottavarima; it has Italian roots, and several prominent English writers had used it since Edward Fairfax  introduced it to England in his translation of an Italian poem. For instance, Lord George Gordon Byron famously used ottavarima in “Don Juan,” and Percy Shelley wrote in the form in “The Witch of Atlas” and “The Zucca,” among other poems. By choosing ottavarima for his works, Yeats announces his connection with the literary past, and he introduces the form to the Modern era as an appropriate vehicle for serious subject matter.
Iambic Pentameter;
“Sailing to Byzantium” is written in a meter called iambic pentameter. Each line in this form uses the iambic “foot” -- one unstressed syllable followed by one stressed syllable -- five times, for a pattern of 10 syllables that alternate between unstressed and stressed. For example, the second stanza’s first line uses perfect iambic pentameter: “An AG-ed MAN is BUT a PAL-try THING,” where capital letters indicate a stressed syllable. Iambic pentameter, like ottavarima, helps establish the elevated tone of “Sailing to Byzantium,” since historically the meter has been used for poems that deal with weighty subject matter, such as philosophy or the sacred.
Metrical Departures;
Although poems are defined by the meter they use most, few poems adhere perfectly to a meter throughout. “Sailing to Byzantium” departs from the iambic pentameter form in several places. In this reading, there’s a trochaic substitution in the first foot, a spondaic substitution in the second foot, a pyrrhic substitution in the third foot, and another spondaic substitution in the fourth foot. The iambic form initiates with the last foot in the line, “The YOUNG,” and recovers in the second line of the poem: “In ONE an-OTH-er’s ARMS, BIRDS in the TREES.” This second line has only one substitution, a trochee in the fourth foot.
By Elder Olson
In "Sailing to Byzantium" an old man faces the problem of old age, of death, and of regeneration, and gives his decision. Old age, he tells us, excludes a man from the sensual joys of youth; the world appears to belong completely to the young, it is no place for the old; indeed, an old man is scarcely a man at all—he is an empty artifice, an effigy merely, of a man; he is a tattered coat upon a stick. This would be very bad, except that the young also are excluded from something; rapt in their sensuality, they are ignorant utterly of the world of spirit. Hence, if old age frees a man from sensual passion, he may rejoice in the liberation of the soul; he is admitted to the realm of the spirit; and his rejoicing will increase according as he realizes the magnificence of the soul. But the soul can best learn its own greatness from great works of art; hence he turns to those great works, but in turning to them, he finds that these are by no means mere effigies, or monuments, but things which have souls also. . . he wishes reincarnation, not now in a mortal body, but in the immortal and changeless embodiment of art.
     By
Sreeka

"Sailing to Byzantium”: Prolegomena to a Poetics of the Lyric by Elder Olson

                 Olson’s essay on Yeats is of interest because of its general relevance to Yeats poetry on its particular analysis of “Sailing to Byzantium” and what the analysis provides as a critical exemplum Olson is concerned with the principal part of the poem. He clearly modifies his view on the poem “Sailing to Byzantium”. The modification involves his recognition that the argument is the “activity” of the poem and then consequently. The character of its speaker is determined by action rather that, “its role in a drama, not action but of thought”. This modification is important because of unwarranted distinction between “thought and activity” has been eliminated.
                 Byzantium is a symbol of life after death; the name generally denotes the city of Constantinople. Byzantium is a transcendental country out of time and nature and it is a world of art and philosophy. “Byzantium is not a place upon a map, but a term in the poem, a term signifying a stage of contemplation, wherein the soul studies itself and so learns both what it is and what consists the true and eternal joy”.
                  Olson before proceeding to the “action” of the poem, he paraphrases its content: ” In Sailing to Byzantium an old man faces the problem of the old age, of death and of regeneration and gives his decision. He tells that old age, excludes a man from the sensual joys of youth; the world appears to belong completely to the young, it is no place for the old; indeed an old man is scarcely a man at all- he is an empty artifice and effigy merely, of a man: he tattered coat upon a stick. This would be very bad, except that the young also are excluded from something; rapt in their sensuality, their ignorant at utterly of the world of the spirit. Hence if old age frees a man from sensual passion, he may rejoice in the liberation of the soul; he is admitted into the realm of the spirit; and his rejoicing, will increase according, as he realizes the magnificence of the soul. But the soul can learn its own greatness from the great works of art; hence he turns to those great works, but in turning to them, he finds that these are by no means mere effigies, or moments, but things which have souls also; these live in the noblest element of God’s fire free from all corruption; hence he prays to our death, for release from his mortal body; and since the unsoiled monuments exhibit the possibility of the soul’s existence in some other matter than flesh, he wishes reincarnation, nor now in a mortal body, but in the immortal and changeless embodiment of art”.
                 The terms around which the poem is organized are a series of opposition-youth, sensually active but spiritually passive, the kind of old age lacks both sensually and spiritually. On analyzing the poem, we find in the first two stanzas art is considered as inanimate, as an object of contemplation. In the second two stanzas art is considered as animate, God’s who can consume the last shred of the old man’s sensuality. The first stanza of the poem presents rejection of passion, second presents acceptance and realization that art of insouled, third presents a correction of embodiment an fourth presents the acceptance of the incorruptible. Olson also points out to the additional structural values of the poem which are both organic and geometric. 
                 Olson says that the basic terms of a lyric poem do not reveal their meanings from the chance associations of the reader. They do not conform to the dictionary meanings, but take their significance from the context. Olson says that the poetry takes its association from the context through the juxtaposition to other terms with which they are equated, contrasted, correlated or combined. Olson has also brought in some of the terms from the poem to defend his arguments. The term “Singing” is extended beyond its usual meaning to cover two kinds of jubilation-rejoice of the natural creature and that of the artificial as a consequence similarly “intellect” and all terms associated with it suffer extension. “Byzantium” is not a historical city and no tourist or historian is to contribute with information. It is not a glance upon a map but a term in the poem. Olson also argues that the poet’s uses object to fit in his poetry to convey his thought. Physical thing determinate the nature and is subject to physical laws, such as Newton’s law. Every poem is an independent universe with its law provided by the poet. Olson concludes his argument by stating that the bare argument of “Sailing to Byzantium” is not of the poem but he argues that argument in the principle of the poem.
                The term “lyric” has given an extra-ordinary variety of applications and it varies with the approaches of literary criticism. The Critic analyses the various aspects of the poem “Sailing to Byzantium” and concludes that the poem is a poetics of the lyric form.
                                                                                                   By,
                                                                                                              S.T.Sreenidhi
                                                                                                    I M.A English Literature

Shakespeare's tragedies and comedies.Submitted By,J.MERY JOYLIN TREASA.


Comedies and Tragedies of Shakespeare have a close connection as proved by James Smith.

James smith, as one of the greatest exponents of formalistic criticism, analyses Shakespeare’s comedies and tragedies in accordance with “As You Like It”, “Macbeth” and “Hamlet”. Shakespeare’s success is said to be due to his integrity and his manifold interests, being coordinated regularly to strengthen one play after the other. A tragic play is a kind in which one or more characters in it have a moral flaw that leads to his/her downfall. In the side of a comic play, it has at least one humorous character with a joyful ending.  Belief is said to be an author’s integrity. Shakespeare has given a number of early years spending in his comedies which are not his significant part. But still, these comedies have shed their lights on his upcoming tragedies. If it is comprehensible, then the comedies should be shunned. But, for some readers, comedies are less inviting than the tragedies. Comedy admits interludes and sideshows.

In his comedy like “As You Like It”, Jaques plays a common role as an intruder and he used to have a quest for melancholy and thus Rosalind calls Jaques a melancholy fellow. He used to travel and get acquainted with a sorrow. In the whole play, Jaques seems to be travelling, which brought him anything but profit: “I have gain’d,” he insists, “my experience”. He replies to Rosalind that, his melancholy is at least sincere as it is as pleasing to him as jollity to other men: “I doe love it better than laughing.” But, Rosalind appears as a character who is experiencing melancholy, from the place where she is. Also, she appears as a rebuke in front of Jaques.

In the case of Hamlet and Macbeth-their melancholy seems to be genuine. As Macbeth is totally collapsed, when he is informed, lady Macbeth is dead. He loses his interest in the worldly life and utters the words, “Life is a tale, told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. The pathetic cry of the villainous character elevates him to the level of a tragic hero. Therefore, he procrastinates and hence, it transforms into a great tragedy which results in his melancholy. On the other hand, the melancholy of Jaques is forced to him through his “wide travel.” So in all the plays of Shakespeare, there will be a taste of bitterness embedded in it. Hence there will be a vast difference in the characters of his tragedies and comedies, but still there will be a relationship within the characters.

 Thus by compiling such facts, James Smith has given his assumption by which, Shakespeare’s comedies and tragedies have a relation with their themes and characters.

Submitted By,

J. Mery Joylin Treasa,

1st M.A English Literature.
The Aspects in which Jaques   and Hamlet are related to.
Jaques and Hamlet are related only in the aspect of their melancholy. Jaques’s melancholy is caused by his travels whereas Hamlet’s is caused by the sin of others. Jaques argues his melancholy is sincere and it is pleasing to him as happiness to other men. Rosalind considers that Jaques is more pitiable and ignorant  than an old woman.  Jaques’s melancholy is not the melancholy of the scholars, musicians, courtiers and soldiers.  He is not melancholic because of disappointments of the private world whereas Hamlet is unhappy because of his circumstances.  Jaques explains his melancholy as “It is a melancholy of mine owne, compounded by many simples, extracted from many objects.” Hamlet explains his melancholy as “ I have of late, lost all my mirth, forgone all custom of exercise.” Both Jaques and Hamlet sees nothing more valuable in the world. They feel a kind of emptiness in their mind. Both of them are skeptical. Jaques’s travels are the origin of his skepticism. In spite of his skepticism Jaques is not put to test but Hamlet is called upon to avenge a father and to govern a kingdom. Jaques is a true traveler who is occupied with the surface only,  not the essence of objects before him. Jaques compares human life to a theatrical performance saying “All the world’s a stage and all the men and women merely players.” Hamlet leads a fuller life than Jaques.  Hamlet is more conscious of himself.  Hamlet cannot be easily betrayed into action whereas Jaques looks back without regret.  Hamlet needs to be surprised by extraordinary circumstances. Hamlet is not idle. Hamlet speaks with a disgust or an impatience but for Jaques it is unknown. Time hangs heavy on a skeptic’s hands. For Jaques and Hamlet the world contains nothing worthy that can take off their time. Jaques indulges the habit of gossip. James Smith considers that Jaques is not an intruder.



SUBMITTED BY
R. S. LAKSIKA,
1 MA ENGLISH.

Thursday, 19 October 2017

INTRODUCTION TO ARCHETYPAL  APPROACH
FACTUALS:
1.       What are the other names of Archetypal approach?
                            Totemic , mythological or ritualistic
2. What is an Archetypal Criticism ?
                            It is the demonstration of some basic cultural pattern of great meaning and great appeal to humanity in a work of art
3. Name the two important figures of the Archetypal approach?
                             Sir James George Frazer & Carl Gustav Jung
4. Name the major works of Frazer ?
                             The Golden Bough (twelve volumes)
5. What is the chief  contribution of Carl Gustav Jung for archetypal criticism?
                              The theory of collective unconsciousness
6. Who are the followers of Frazer and Sir Edward Tylor ?
                             Jane Harrison, F.M. Cornford , Gilbert Murray, Andrew Lang.
7. Who examined the ritualistic basis of Greek comedy in one study and the ritual figure of the Greek god-king in another?
                             Cornford
8. Miss Harrison’s exploration of the social origins of Greek religion is seen in_____________
                           Ancient  Art and Ritual  , 1913.
9. Name any three mythical writers?
                           Robert Graves,  James Joyce and Yeats. 
10. Who retold the story of Psyche and Cupid?
                              C.S.Lewis
11. Who established that rituals and taboos are dealt consciously by primitive man, but unconsciously by Civilized man?
                              Freud
12. What is Myth according to Erich Fromm?
                              Myth is “a message from ourselves to ourselves, a secret language which enables us to treat inner as if outer event”.
13. Archetypal  Criticism aims to discover  and  decode the secret language in literary works.
14. Name the  work of D.H.Lawrence which exhibits various fictitious characters as archetypes?
                           Studies  in Classic American Literature, 1923.
15. What is the classic written by Maud Bodkin of archetypal kind?
                             Archetypal  patterns in poetry ,1934
16. Kenneth Burke relies in his concept of _________
                          Symbolic action
17. According to whom did ‘Artist is often a “medicine man” and the work of art his “medicine”’?
                            Kenneth Burke
18. Name the writers who have studied the ritual patterns in Shakespeare?
                           Collin Still in The Timeless Theme, 1936 and G.Wilson Knight in several of his works.
19.Name the American novels which employed the scheme of Archetypal criticism?
                           The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Moby-Dick
20.Anthropological literature re-establishes us as members of ______________
                          Ancient race of Man.


 by
t.Githika
Five approaches of Literary Criticism
-         Hamlet and Orestes
Submitted by,
S.L. Dhanya.
1.     According to Murray whose writings are far away from Greek epic?
Aeschylus, Euripides, Shakespeare.
2.     Who suggest the name of Marston in her Greek play?
Miss Spens
3.     The work Amloði means fool.
4.     What is the ritual story used in Hamlet and Orsters?
The Golden Bough
5.     Who defeated Agamemnon?
Aegisthus
6.     Who help Aegisthus to defeat Agamemnon?
The Queen.
7.     Who identified Orester as a winter god?
Hermann Usener.
8.     Drifa of Finland was killed by whom?
Her son Visburr.
9.     Rydberg says Gora as a tender person.
10.                        According to Professor Bardely Getrude is a soft animal nature.
11.                        According to Saxo Who is said to be the Green Earth?
Groa
12.                        What is the remarkable book of Miss Phillpott?
The Elder Edda.
13.                        In hamlet and oresters life and death is compared to summer and winter.
14.                        Whose characters are compared to mother Earth?
Rhea, Gaia, Jocasta.
15.                        According to Saxo Horvendillus is an ancient Teutonic god.
16.                        Define Myth?
Myth is defined as the things said over a ritual act.
17.                        Mention two similarities between Getrude and Clytemnestra?
                                                       i.            The both were primitive king’s wife.
                                                     ii.            Both marries their husband’s Slayer.
18.                        Whom does Clytemnestra marries?
Aegisthus
19.                        Who is the historical king of Mycenae?
Amloði
20.                        In plays like Hamlet and Electra have Certainly Fine and Flexible character study.
21.                        What is the famous phrase of Aristotle?

“The sort of thing that would happen”; only his conception of “What would happen” is the phrase of Aristotle.

Wednesday, 18 October 2017

AS YOU LIKE IT
                                  James Smith
Similarities in Shakespeare’s character:
                                    James Smith, a formalistic critic analyses Shakespeare’s play AS YOU LIKE IT, a romantic comedy applying the tools of formalistic criticism. The play is generally called as a romantic comedy, but he calls as unromantic. He starts with Jaques’s melancholy, it is not innate in nature. It is assumed, he compares Jaques with Macbeth and Hamlet. The melancholy of both Macbeth and Hamlet seems to be genuine while Jaques is unreal and artificial. 
                                   During the course of play, Jaques doesn’t engage in travel, he frequently changes not his surrounding but his interlocutor. He indulges the habit of gossip, which is a traveller immobilized. Time hangs heavy on Hamlet’s, it is the most obvious point of resemblance between him and Jaques. In another tragedy, time hangs on Macbeth’s hand. He finds himself incapable of believing in the reality even of his wife’s death. Macbeth is rudely shaken when he is informed that Lady Macbeth is dead. He loses interest in the worldly life. He says,
“Life is a tale
 told by an idiot
full of sound and fury
signifying nothing”.
                                        The pathetic cry of the villainous character elevates him to the level of a tragic hero. Hamlet is too young to commit the murder. He, therefore procrastinates, which snowballs into a great problem and results in his melancholy. He cries thus “To be or not to be…” the melancholy of Jaques is forced to him through his “wide travel”. Even Rosalind finds out the nature of his grief. She, therefore, prefers a clown like Jaques.
     
                                     Skepticism of a kind is also similar it is obvious that Hamlet speaks with a disgust or an impatience, Macbeth with a weariness, which Jaques are unknown. Anticipating a little, it might be said that Macbeth and Hamlet lead a fuller, a more complete life than Jaques.     
                                      One consequence is that they cannot easily be betrayed into action. Whereas Jaques looks back without regret, even with complacency, on his travel, it is only with reluctance that Macbeth lapses into the habit of fighting for fighting sake.
                                      Hamlet’s melancholy is caused by the sin of others and Macbeth’s by the sin of his own, so Jaques -if the Duke is to be trusted -has not only travelled but been
                               ….. a libertine,
                             As sensual as the brutish sting itself.
                                    The cure for all three is very much same. Fortinbras( his friend) reproaches Hamlet, and Hamlet reproaches himself, with lacking a “hue of resolution,” which, as it is “native” is a defect he should not possess; Macbeth contrasts  the division of counsels within him, suspending activity, with the strong monarchy or “single state” enjoyed in the healthy man by the reason.
                            Silvius, Touchstone, Orlando, the Duke, each has melancholy of their own; and so too has Rosalind, in so far as she is in love with Orlando.
                                       Touchstone is unromantic. Although he falls in love with Audrey the Shepherdess, his love for Audrey is nor sincere, neither genuine. He wants to marry her with the help of the priest and dessert her later. His division of human life into seven stages is also unromantic. He seems to be more pessimistic than romantic. Rosalind the protagonist of the play also seems to be unromantic in nature. It is true that she falls in love with Orlando. But the fact remains that she has not fallen headlong in love with him. She tries to cure the melody of her lover with wolves howling at the moon during the night.  Thus the characters are unromantic and full of melancholy. Thus, James Smith, one of the great exponents of formalistic criticism finds the similarities in Shakespeare’s characters in both his comedy and tragedy.
                                   Submitted by, 
Marina Delfin